REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

DAVID A. BAKER, Magistrate Judge.

TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein:

Upon a party's submission of an affidavit of indigency, any court of the United States may authorize the party to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Section 1915 grants broad discretion to the district courts in the management of in forma pauperis cases. Clark v. Ga. Pardons and Paroles Bd., 915 F.2d 636, 639 (11th Cir. 1990); Phillips v. Mashburn, 746 F.2d 782, 785 (11th Cir. 1984).

Here, the Complaint1 is premised on a claim for improper denial of social security benefits. The affidavit tendered, however, appears incomplete. For example, Plaintiff asserts that she is a "stay at home mom," but lists no dependents. Although Plaintiff applied for a period of disability insurance benefits (which requires a showing of past employment), she lists her date of last employment (and details of same) as "N/A." She lists no monies received from any source, no assets whatsoever except for a truck, and lists no debts other than rent, which her husband pays. Her spouse is employed and makes over $350 a week. Plaintiff does not meet pauper status on this showing. It is respectfully recommended that the motion be denied, without prejudice to renewal upon a complete showing of Plaintiff's pertinent information sufficient to evaluate her financial situation.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained in this report within fourteen (14) days from the date of its filing shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking the factual findings on appeal.