BONNICI v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 6:12-cv-1014-Orl-19TBS. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120726766
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendants U.S. Bank, National Association's and Bank of America, N.A.'s Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Complaint (Doc. 18). Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), movants represent that the Plaintiffs' attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, the motion is GRANTED. Defendants, U.S. Bank, National Association and Bank of America, National As
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendants U.S. Bank, National Association's and Bank of America, N.A.'s Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Complaint (Doc. 18). Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), movants represent that the Plaintiffs' attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, the motion is GRANTED. Defendants, U.S. Bank, National Association and Bank of America, National Ass..
More
ORDER
THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants U.S. Bank, National Association's and Bank of America, N.A.'s Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Complaint (Doc. 18). Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), movants represent that the Plaintiffs' attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time.
Upon due consideration, the motion is GRANTED. Defendants, U.S. Bank, National Association and Bank of America, National Association shall have through August 14, 2012 within to respond to Plaintiffs' complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
