HERMIDA v. INNOVATION VENTURES, LLC, 2:13-cv-47-Ftm-38UA. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20130604830
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2013
Summary: ORDER SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Agreed Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer to Multidistrict Litigation (Doc. #11) filed on March 6, 2013. The Parties seek to stay all proceedings pending transfer and coordination of this action with the Multidistrict Litigation case in the Central District of California concerning other marketing and sale of the Defendant's product, 5-Hour Energy cases. Upon review, the relief will be granted for a
Summary: ORDER SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Agreed Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer to Multidistrict Litigation (Doc. #11) filed on March 6, 2013. The Parties seek to stay all proceedings pending transfer and coordination of this action with the Multidistrict Litigation case in the Central District of California concerning other marketing and sale of the Defendant's product, 5-Hour Energy cases. Upon review, the relief will be granted for a p..
More
ORDER
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Agreed Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer to Multidistrict Litigation (Doc. #11) filed on March 6, 2013. The Parties seek to stay all proceedings pending transfer and coordination of this action with the Multidistrict Litigation case in the Central District of California concerning other marketing and sale of the Defendant's product, 5-Hour Energy® cases. Upon review, the relief will be granted for a period of time to allow a decision of the JPML regarding transfer.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
(1) Agreed Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer to Multidistrict Litigation (Doc. #11) is GRANTED to the extent that this case is STAYED for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of this Order. If the case is not otherwise transferred within this time period, the Parties may seek to continue the stay upon expiration of the time period.
(2) As this matter is stayed, Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File Motion for Class Certification (Doc. #17) is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff may re-file the request for extension of time if the action is not transferred to the Central District of California for consolidated pretrial proceedings.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
