BRADLEY v. CITY OF SAITH CLOUD, 6:12-cv-1348-ORL-37TBS. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20130712777
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2013
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Amended Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 34.) Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), Plaintiff represents that the Defendants' attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have through July 12, 2013 to file her Second Amended Complaint. IT IS SO ORD
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Amended Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 34.) Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), Plaintiff represents that the Defendants' attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have through July 12, 2013 to file her Second Amended Complaint. IT IS SO ORDE..
More
ORDER
THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Amended Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 34.) Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), Plaintiff represents that the Defendants' attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have through July 12, 2013 to file her Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
