JOHNSON v. SRI AMBAJI INVESTMENTS, LLC, 6:13-cv-925-ORL-37TBS. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20130806760
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2013
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for an Enlargement of All Litigation Deadlines to Follow Deadline to Respond to Complaint (Doc. 22). The motion is due to be DENIED. Settlements are encouraged by the Court in all cases, including this one. But, a review of the docket leads the Court to conclude that there is nothing complicated about Plaintiff's claim or the law that applies to it and the parties have had sufficient time within t
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for an Enlargement of All Litigation Deadlines to Follow Deadline to Respond to Complaint (Doc. 22). The motion is due to be DENIED. Settlements are encouraged by the Court in all cases, including this one. But, a review of the docket leads the Court to conclude that there is nothing complicated about Plaintiff's claim or the law that applies to it and the parties have had sufficient time within to..
More
ORDER
THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for an Enlargement of All Litigation Deadlines to Follow Deadline to Respond to Complaint (Doc. 22). The motion is due to be DENIED. Settlements are encouraged by the Court in all cases, including this one. But, a review of the docket leads the Court to conclude that there is nothing complicated about Plaintiff's claim or the law that applies to it and the parties have had sufficient time within to negotiate a settlement. While the parties are encouraged to continue with their negotiations, it is time to proceed with the litigation. The motion is also denied because Defendant's counsel has not complied with the Court's last Order to include the full case number in all filings.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
