Filed: Apr. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOHN ANTOON, II, District Judge. This case is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Approve the Parties' Proposed Settlement and Enter Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. No. 22), and the parties' Joint Motion to Approve the Parties' Revised Proposed Settlement and Enter Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 24). The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the original motion be denied, and the revised motion be granted. After an independent de novo revi
Summary: ORDER JOHN ANTOON, II, District Judge. This case is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Approve the Parties' Proposed Settlement and Enter Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. No. 22), and the parties' Joint Motion to Approve the Parties' Revised Proposed Settlement and Enter Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 24). The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the original motion be denied, and the revised motion be granted. After an independent de novo revie..
More
ORDER
JOHN ANTOON, II, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Approve the Parties' Proposed Settlement and Enter Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. No. 22), and the parties' Joint Motion to Approve the Parties' Revised Proposed Settlement and Enter Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 24). The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the original motion be denied, and the revised motion be granted.
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Report and Recommendation filed April 7, 2014 (Doc. No. 25) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. The parties' Joint Motion to Approve the Parties' Proposed Settlement and Enter Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. No. 22) is DENIED.
3. The parties' Joint Motion to Approve the Parties' Revised Proposed Settlement and Enter Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. No. 24) is GRANTED.
4. The Court finds that the Revised Settlement Agreement is a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over Fair Labor Standard Act issues.
5. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this file.
DONE and ORDERED.
