REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PHILIP R. LAMMENS, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand. (Doc. 14). Although filed as an opposed motion, Plaintiff has not filed an objection and her time for doing so has passed. Accordingly, the undersigned will treat the Motion as unopposed.

Pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 405(g) the Court is empowered to reverse the decision of the Commissioner with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. Shalala v. Schaefer, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993). The failure of the ALJ to develop the record constitutes sufficient grounds for remand. Brissette v. Heckler, 730 F.2d 548 (8th Cir. 1984), appeal after remand 613 F.Supp. 722 (E.D. Mo. 1985), judgment aff=d in part, rev=d in part, 784 F.2d 864 (8th Cir. 1986). Where the district court cannot discern the basis for the Commissioner's decision, a sentence-four remand may be appropriate to allow him to explain the basis for his decision. Falcon v. Heckler, 732 F.2d 827, 829-30 (11th Cir. 1984) (holding remand was appropriate to allow the ALJ to explain the basis for the determination that the claimant's depression did not significantly affect her ability to work and treating psychologist acknowledged that claimant had improved in response to treatment and could work in a supportive, noncompetitive, tailor-made work environment). On remand under sentence four, the ALJ should review the case on a complete record, including any new material evidence. Diorio v. Heckler, 721 F.2d 726, 729 (11th Cir. 1983) (finding that it was necessary for the ALJ on remand to consider psychiatric report tendered to Appeals Council); Reeves v. Heckler, 734 F.2d 519, 522 n. 1 (11th Cir. 1984) (holding that the ALJ should consider on remand the need for an orthopedic evaluation).

Therefore, following a careful review of the record and filings, the undersigned agrees with the parties that it is appropriate to remand this matter to the Commissioner. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that:

(1) Defendant's Opposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 14) be GRANTED.

(2) This action be REVERSED AND REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)1 to the Commissioner for the following reason:

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained in this report within fourteen (14) days from the date of its filing shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking the factual findings on appeal. DONE and ENTERED in Ocala, Florida on April 14, 2014.