VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court pursuant to the parties' Joint Motion for Enlargement of Time Under Case Management Order to Secure Experts and Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Fourth Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. # 413), filed on May 6, 2014. For the reasons that follow, the Motion is granted in part.
On August 15, 2012, Lytle initiated this collective action pursuant the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). (Doc. # 1). Thereafter, on December 7, 2012, this Court entered a Case Management Scheduling Order (Doc. # 19), and then entered an Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order on March 8, 2013. (Doc. # 34). In the Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order the deadline for disclosure of expert reports for both parties was April 15, 2013. (
On April 15, 2013, the parties filed a joint motion for enlargement of deadline to disclose expert reports, wherein the parties requested an Order enlarging the deadline to disclose expert reports until forty-five days after a ruling from this Court certifying the action as a collective action. (Doc. # 83). On May 6, 2014, Thomas B. McCoun, United States Magistrate Judge, entered an Order granting the parties' joint motion nunc pro tunc. (Doc. # 120).
This Court entered a Second Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order on June 20, 2013 (Doc. # 174), a Third Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order on October 8, 2013 (Doc. # 264), and the operative Fourth Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. # 409) on April 29, 2014. In the Fourth Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order, the Court indicates that the disclosure of expert reports is "Already Completed."
In the present Motion, the parties request that the Court reconsider the Fourth Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order, specifically the deadline for expert disclosures. According to the parties:
(Doc. # 413 at ¶¶ 4, 6, 8).
This Court conditionally certified the collective class on January 10, 2014. (Doc. # 340). Therefore, the parties had forty-five days — until February 24, 2014, — to disclose their experts in compliance with Judge McCoun's Order. This should have already been completed. However, the parties admittedly have failed to do so.
Although the Court acknowledges the challenges inherent in managing a collective action, these challenges do not justify the parties' continuous disregard of the deadlines imposed by this Court.
Nonetheless, in light of the parties' omission, this Court finds that the ends of justice would be best served by modifying the Fourth Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order to allow for a brief extension of the deadline to disclose expert reports. Accordingly, the deadline for both parties to disclose expert reports is July 1, 2014. The discovery deadline remains September 15, 2014, and this Court will not grant any further extensions of this deadline under any circumstances. Therefore, the parties are advised to conduct discovery well in advance of this deadline, so they can adequately react to any challenges that may arise. The parties are free to stipulate to the deadline by which the parties are to obtain and name experts.
Accordingly, it is now
(1) The parties' Joint Motion for Enlargement of Time Under Case Management Order to Secure Experts and Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Fourth Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. # 413) is
(2) The deadline for both parties to disclose expert reports is July 1, 2014.
(3) All remaining deadlines in the Fourth Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. # 409) remain in place.