SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. NADEL, 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140516782
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 15, 2014
Latest Update: May 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. LAZZARA, District Judge. Upon due and careful consideration of the procedural history of this case, and consistent with the Court's order entered July 16, 2013, at docket 1040, it is ordered and adjudged that the Receiver's Unopposed Verified Motion for Leave to Retain Whitehorse Partners LLC to Market and Sell Quest Energy Management Group, Inc. (Dkt. 1115) is denied without prejudice to being renewed in the event the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirms this Court's pr
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. LAZZARA, District Judge. Upon due and careful consideration of the procedural history of this case, and consistent with the Court's order entered July 16, 2013, at docket 1040, it is ordered and adjudged that the Receiver's Unopposed Verified Motion for Leave to Retain Whitehorse Partners LLC to Market and Sell Quest Energy Management Group, Inc. (Dkt. 1115) is denied without prejudice to being renewed in the event the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirms this Court's pre..
More
ORDER
RICHARD A. LAZZARA, District Judge.
Upon due and careful consideration of the procedural history of this case, and consistent with the Court's order entered July 16, 2013, at docket 1040, it is ordered and adjudged that the Receiver's Unopposed Verified Motion for Leave to Retain Whitehorse Partners LLC to Market and Sell Quest Energy Management Group, Inc. (Dkt. 1115) is denied without prejudice to being renewed in the event the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirms this Court's previous order including Quest in the receivership estate, which order was entered on May 24, 2013, at docket 1024. Because that previous order is on appeal to the Eleventh Circuit, this Court is divested of any jurisdiction to entertain the present motion. See Griggs v. Provident Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58, 103 S.Ct. 400, 402, 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982) (stating that "[t]he filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance — it confers jurisdiction of the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.").
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
