GREENE v. COLVIN, 8:13-CIV-1660-T-17-TGW. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140604c13
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the report and recommendation (R&R) issued by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on May 6, 2014 (Doc. 21). The magistrate judge recommended that the denial of Social Security disability benefits be affirmed. STANDARD OF REVIEW When a party makes a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact in the report and recommendation, the district court should make a de novo re
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the report and recommendation (R&R) issued by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on May 6, 2014 (Doc. 21). The magistrate judge recommended that the denial of Social Security disability benefits be affirmed. STANDARD OF REVIEW When a party makes a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact in the report and recommendation, the district court should make a de novo rev..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the report and recommendation (R&R) issued by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on May 6, 2014 (Doc. 21). The magistrate judge recommended that the denial of Social Security disability benefits be affirmed.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
When a party makes a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact in the report and recommendation, the district court should make a de novo review of the record with respect to that factual issue. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); U.S. v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667 (1980); Jeffrey S. v. State Board of Education of State of Georgia, 896 F.2d 507 (11th Cir. 1990). However, when no timely and specific objections are filed, case law indicates that the court should review the findings using a clearly erroneous standard. Gropp v. United Airlines, Inc., 817 F.Supp. 1558, 1562 (M.D. Fla. 1993). No timely objections have been filed.
The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and made an independent review of the record. Upon due consideration, the Court concurs with the report and recommendation. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the report and recommendation (Doc. 21) be adopted and incorporated by reference and the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be affirmed. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for the defendant and against the Plaintiff.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
