Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

THOMPSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 3:13-cv-1010-J-34MCR. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20140612a93 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 19; Report), entered on May 15, 2014. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Richardson recommends that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. See Report at 6. No objections to the Report have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed. The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made b
More

ORDER

MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 19; Report), entered on May 15, 2014. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Richardson recommends that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. See Report at 6. No objections to the Report have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed.

The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at *1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007).

Upon independent review of the Magistrate Judge's Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 19) of Magistrate Judge Richardson is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AFFIRMING the Commissioner's decision and to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer