Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DE LA LUZ v. LFC AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, INC., 2:13-cv-481-FtM-38DNF. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20140626a51 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Stipulation of Dismissal of Action ( Doc. 24 ) filed on June 24, 2014. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case without a court order. The Rule reads in pertinent part: Subject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) A notice of dismissal before the opposing party
More

ORDER1

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Stipulation of Dismissal of Action (Doc. 24) filed on June 24, 2014. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case without a court order. The Rule reads in pertinent part:

Subject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) A notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) A stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A).

In this instance, the Parties jointly file this stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The dismissal is with prejudice. All Parties have signed the stipulation.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case and enter judgment accordingly.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer