Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KEHN v. SAM'S EAST, INC., 2:13-cv-532-FtM-38DNF. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20140708873 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Joint Stipulation for Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice ( Doc. 25 ) filed on July 1, 2014. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case without a court order. The Rule reads in pertinent part: Subject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) A notice of dismissal
More

ORDER1

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Joint Stipulation for Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 25) filed on July 1, 2014. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case without a court order. The Rule reads in pertinent part:

Subject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) A notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) A stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A).

The Parties indicate this matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. The Parties stipulate they will bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Both Parties have signed the document. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) this matter is due to be dismissed.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the case, terminate any pending motions, and enter judgment accordingly.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer