HOUSTON v. JT PRIVATE DUTY HOME CARE, LLC, 2:14-cv-245-FtM-38DNF. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140708879
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jul. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 06, 2014
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Defendant JT Private Duty Home Care, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) or in the Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) ( Doc. #11 ) filed on June 19, 2014. On July 2, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint ( Doc. #13 ). Therefore, the initial Motion to Dismiss is now moot and due to be denied as such.
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Defendant JT Private Duty Home Care, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) or in the Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) ( Doc. #11 ) filed on June 19, 2014. On July 2, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint ( Doc. #13 ). Therefore, the initial Motion to Dismiss is now moot and due to be denied as such. ..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Defendant JT Private Duty Home Care, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) or in the Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) (Doc. #11) filed on June 19, 2014. On July 2, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. #13). Therefore, the initial Motion to Dismiss is now moot and due to be denied as such.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
The Defendant JT Private Duty Home Care, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) or in the Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) (Doc. #11) is DENIED as moot.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Source: Leagle
