welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Case Laws
  3. District Court, M.D. Florida
  4. 2014
  5. COSBY v. LEE COUNTY, 2:14-cv-255-FtM-38DNF. (2014)

COSBY v. LEE COUNTY, 2:14-cv-255-FtM-38DNF. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20140822952 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Defendant Lee County, Jack Barden, Paul Valenti, and Glen Salyer's Dispositive Motion Dismiss Complaint ( Doc. #21 ) filed on June 24, 2014. On July 22, 2014, all Defendants filed an Amended Motion to Dismiss ( Doc. #27 ). Therefore, the initial Motion to Dismiss ( Doc. #21 ) is due to be denied as moot. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: The Defendant Lee County, Jack Barden, Paul Valenti, and Glen Sal
More

ORDER1

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Defendant Lee County, Jack Barden, Paul Valenti, and Glen Salyer's Dispositive Motion Dismiss Complaint (Doc. #21) filed on June 24, 2014. On July 22, 2014, all Defendants filed an Amended Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #27). Therefore, the initial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #21) is due to be denied as moot.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

The Defendant Lee County, Jack Barden, Paul Valenti, and Glen Salyer's Dispositive Motion Dismiss Complaint (Doc. #21) is DENIED as moot.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Source:  Leagle
Lawyers who claimed
No Lawyers
Citations
2:14-cv-255-FtM-38DNF.
Counsels
  • John S. Turner
Similar Cases

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer