Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE PHILLIPS, 2:14-mc-22-FtM-38 (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20140909643 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon review of the Notice of Pendency. ( Doc. #3 ). There are currently pending or closed five (5) cases that are directly related to the instant case. Each of the five (5) related cases were all assigned to and presided over by the Honorable John E. Steele. ( Doc. #3 ). Therefore, pursuant to M.D. Fla. Local Rule 1.04(b), this case is transferred to the Honorable John E. Steele, with his consent. Accordingly
More

ORDER1

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon review of the Notice of Pendency. (Doc. #3). There are currently pending or closed five (5) cases that are directly related to the instant case. Each of the five (5) related cases were all assigned to and presided over by the Honorable John E. Steele. (Doc. #3). Therefore, pursuant to M.D. Fla. Local Rule 1.04(b), this case is transferred to the Honorable John E. Steele, with his consent.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to reassign the case the Honorable John E. Steele with his consent. The Honorable Sheri Polster Chappell is no longer assigned to this action.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer