Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CAPASSO v. COLLIER COUNTY, 2:12-cv-499-FtM-38DNF. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20141023n75 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on a sua sponte review of the file. On April 8, 2014, the Court entered an Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order ( Doc. #27 ) that set a Final Pretrial Conference for October 31, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. before the undersigned. The Court will reschedules the Final Pretrial Conference to November 21, 2014, at 9:30 a.m., and, as a result, extends the deadline for the parties to file a joint pretrial statement,
More

ORDER1

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on a sua sponte review of the file. On April 8, 2014, the Court entered an Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. #27) that set a Final Pretrial Conference for October 31, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. before the undersigned. The Court will reschedules the Final Pretrial Conference to November 21, 2014, at 9:30 a.m., and, as a result, extends the deadline for the parties to file a joint pretrial statement, motions in limine, trial briefs, and all other motions to November 14, 2014.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) The Final Pretrial Conference is rescheduled for November 21, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. before The Honorable Sheri Polster Chappell. (2) The parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement (including a single set of jointly proposed jury instructions and verdict form, voir dire questions, witness lists, and exhibit lists on the approved form) and all other motions (including motions in limine and trial briefs) on or before November 14, 2014.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer