TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT v. ATTORNEYS' TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC., 2:13-cv-670-FtM-38DNF. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20141028m57
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2014
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Parties' Corrected Joint Motion to Enlarge Pretrial Deadlines and Continue Trial ( Doc. #127 ) filed on October 22, 2014. In their Motion, the Parties seek a Fourth Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order, extending all dates by an additional 150 days. In support, the Parties aver that "substantial privilege issues have arisen which have complicated and delayed discovery." ( Doc. #127 at 2 ). The P
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Parties' Corrected Joint Motion to Enlarge Pretrial Deadlines and Continue Trial ( Doc. #127 ) filed on October 22, 2014. In their Motion, the Parties seek a Fourth Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order, extending all dates by an additional 150 days. In support, the Parties aver that "substantial privilege issues have arisen which have complicated and delayed discovery." ( Doc. #127 at 2 ). The Pa..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Parties' Corrected Joint Motion to Enlarge Pretrial Deadlines and Continue Trial (Doc. #127) filed on October 22, 2014. In their Motion, the Parties seek a Fourth Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order, extending all dates by an additional 150 days. In support, the Parties aver that "substantial privilege issues have arisen which have complicated and delayed discovery." (Doc. #127 at 2). The Parties also note that document production by third parties has been substantial and ongoing. (Doc. #127 at 4). In light of the complexity of this case and the outstanding discovery issues, the Court finds that an extension of pre-trial deadlines and the trial date is warranted. Because these deadlines have already been extended numerous times, the Court is not inclined to extend the deadlines by 150 days. However, the Court finds that an extension of 90 days is appropriate. However, the Court will look with disfavor on future requests for extensions of time.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
1. The Parties' Corrected Joint Motion to Enlarge Pretrial Deadlines and Continue Trial (Doc. #127) is GRANTED in part.
2. The Court enters this Fourth Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order:
Disclosure of Expert Reports Plaintiff: March 2, 2015
Defendant: March 16, 2015
Discovery Deadline: April 1, 2015
Mediation Deadline: May 29, 2015
Dispositive Motions, Daubert, and Markman Motions: May 4, 2015
Meeting In Person to Prepare Joint Final Pretrial June 29, 2015
Statement:
Joint Final Pretrial Statement (Including a Single Set of July 8, 2015
Jointly Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form, Voir
Dire Questions, Witnesses Lists, Exhibit Lists on
Approved Form):
All Other Motions, Including Motions In Limine, Trial July 8, 2015
Briefs:
Final Pretrial Conference Date: July 31, 2015
Time: 9:30 A.M.
Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Trial Term Begins: September 1, 2015
[Trials Before Magistrate Judges Being on Date Certain]
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Source: Leagle
