Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MARSHALL v. COLLIER COUNTY, 2:14-cv-479-FtM-38DNF. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20141120b57 Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2014
Summary: ORDER SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon sua sponte review of the docket in this action. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in this Court pursuant to federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. 1331. (Doc. #1 at 2). But on November 14, 2014, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs' only count asserted under federal law. ( Doc. #19 ). Therefore, Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause as to how this Court retains subject-matter jurisdiction over this action by
More

ORDER

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon sua sponte review of the docket in this action. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in this Court pursuant to federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331. (Doc. #1 at 2). But on November 14, 2014, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs' only count asserted under federal law. (Doc. #19). Therefore, Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause as to how this Court retains subject-matter jurisdiction over this action by Wednesday, December 3, 2014. If Plaintiffs fail to do so, this action will be dismissed. See King v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 505 F.3d 1160, 1171 (11th Cir. 2007) (noting that in an action filed directly in federal court, the plaintiff bears the burden of adequately pleading, and ultimately proving jurisdiction).

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

Plaintiffs must demonstrate how this Court retains subject-matter jurisdiction over this action by December 3, 2014, or this action will be dismissed.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer