ISAACS v. ONE TOUCH DIRECT, LLC, 8:14-cv-1716-T-30EAJ. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20141120b67
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from FLSA Scheduling Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. 33) ("Plaintiff's Motion") and Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Provide Adequate Responses to the Court's Interrogatories and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Response (Dkt. 37) ("Defendant's Motion"). The Court, having carefully reviewed the motions, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, conc
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from FLSA Scheduling Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. 33) ("Plaintiff's Motion") and Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Provide Adequate Responses to the Court's Interrogatories and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Response (Dkt. 37) ("Defendant's Motion"). The Court, having carefully reviewed the motions, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, concl..
More
ORDER
JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from FLSA Scheduling Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. 33) ("Plaintiff's Motion") and Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Provide Adequate Responses to the Court's Interrogatories and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Response (Dkt. 37) ("Defendant's Motion"). The Court, having carefully reviewed the motions, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, concludes that Plaintiff's Motion should be denied and Defendant's Motion should be granted. It is therefore
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from FLSA Scheduling Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. 33) is DENIED.
2. Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Provide Adequate Responses to the Court's Interrogatories and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Response (Dkt. 37) ("Defendant's Motion") is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff shall file with the Court and serve on Defendant complete and accurate answers to Court Interrogatory No. 6 on or before December 2, 2014. Defendant's request to compel information regarding Plaintiff's attorney's fees is denied. The Court's Interrogatories do not require Plaintiff to provide information regarding attorney's fees.
3. Defendant may request a reasonable accounting of attorney's fees and costs to date from Plaintiff's counsel. If Plaintiff's counsel refuses, Defendant may make an appropriate motion to the Court.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
