RADER v. MERCALDO, 6:13-cv-878-Orl-31KRS. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150120a26
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER GREGORY A. PRESNELL, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Amended Motion Objecting to Defendants' Requested Costs (Doc. No. 84), filed December 22, 2014. On January 15, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 86) recommending that the objection to the requested costs be sustained; however, Defendants withdrew their Bill of Costs after entry of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 87). Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Th
Summary: ORDER GREGORY A. PRESNELL, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Amended Motion Objecting to Defendants' Requested Costs (Doc. No. 84), filed December 22, 2014. On January 15, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 86) recommending that the objection to the requested costs be sustained; however, Defendants withdrew their Bill of Costs after entry of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 87). Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The..
More
ORDER
GREGORY A. PRESNELL, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Amended Motion Objecting to Defendants' Requested Costs (Doc. No. 84), filed December 22, 2014.
On January 15, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 86) recommending that the objection to the requested costs be sustained; however, Defendants withdrew their Bill of Costs after entry of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 87). Therefore, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation is TERMINATED AS MOOT.
2. The Amended Motion Objecting to Defendants' Requested Costs is DENIED AS MOOT.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
