Filed: Feb. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER HARVEY E. SCHLESINGER, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant's "Motion for Funds for Mitigation Specialist" (Dkt. 41, filed Jan. 13, 2015). In the motion, Defendant states that he does not have the funds to hire a mitigation specialist, but that the engagement of a mitigation specialist is needed in this case to assist Defendant at his sentencing, currently scheduled for Wednesday, February 18, 2015. Upon review, however, this Court finds that nothing in the motion describes wor
Summary: ORDER HARVEY E. SCHLESINGER, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant's "Motion for Funds for Mitigation Specialist" (Dkt. 41, filed Jan. 13, 2015). In the motion, Defendant states that he does not have the funds to hire a mitigation specialist, but that the engagement of a mitigation specialist is needed in this case to assist Defendant at his sentencing, currently scheduled for Wednesday, February 18, 2015. Upon review, however, this Court finds that nothing in the motion describes work..
More
ORDER
HARVEY E. SCHLESINGER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant's "Motion for Funds for Mitigation Specialist" (Dkt. 41, filed Jan. 13, 2015). In the motion, Defendant states that he does not have the funds to hire a mitigation specialist, but that the engagement of a mitigation specialist is needed in this case to assist Defendant at his sentencing, currently scheduled for Wednesday, February 18, 2015. Upon review, however, this Court finds that nothing in the motion describes work that Defendant's counsel is not equipped to do.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. Defendant's "Motion for Funds for Mitigation Specialist" (Dkt. 41, filed Jan. 13, 2015) is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
