Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DAY-PETRANO v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 8:14-CV-1287-T-17MAP. (2015)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20150206b02 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2015
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on: Dkt. 16 Motion for Remand Dkt. 18 Response The Complaint in this case includes Plaintiffs claim for bad faith and refusal to pay UM benefits in connection with an accident which occurred on January 5, 2008 in Clearwater, Florida. Plaintiff Mary Katherine Day-Petrano has moved to remand this case to Pinellas County Circuit Court. Defendant Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company opposes the remand of this ca
More

ORDER

ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on:

Dkt. 16 Motion for Remand Dkt. 18 Response

The Complaint in this case includes Plaintiffs claim for bad faith and refusal to pay UM benefits in connection with an accident which occurred on January 5, 2008 in Clearwater, Florida. Plaintiff Mary Katherine Day-Petrano has moved to remand this case to Pinellas County Circuit Court.

Defendant Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company opposes the remand of this case.

I. Discussion

Plaintiff argues that Defendant's Notice of Removal is defective for failing to mention Plaintiffs pending Chapter 12 Bankruptcy Case in which Defendant is a creditor, and is untimely for exceeding the 90-day time limit imposed by Fed. R. Bk. P. 9027(a)(2). Plaintiff also argues that the general removal statute does not control because the remand of claims arising under or related to the Bankruptcy Code is governed by 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1452, which provides for remand on equitable grounds. Plaintiff further argues that Defendant Nationwide has waived its right to remove this case, by filing a proof of claim in the Bankruptcy Court without checking the "set-off' box on the proof of claim form.

Defendant responds that this case was properly removed and removal is timely pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1446(b) and Fed. R. Bk. P. 9027(a)(3). Defendant further responds that this case was not removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1452, and because diversity provides an independent basis of jurisdiction, equitable remand is inapplicable.

Plaintiff Mary Katherine Day-Petrano filed her Complaint in Pinellas County Circuit Court on January 3, 2014, Case No. 14-000133-CI. Plaintiff Day-Petrano filed the First Amended Complaint, in which Plaintiff seeks the award of damages in the amount of $220,000,000.00, on April 20, 2014.

Plaintiff filed a Voluntary Petition under Chapter 12 in United States Bankruptcy Court on February 7, 2014, Case No. 8:14-bk-01368-CPM. Plaintiffs Chapter 12 petition was converted to Chapter 13 on November 10, 2014.

After service on May 2, 2014, Defendant Nationwide removed this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1446 on May 30, 2014 on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. In the Notice of Removal, Defendant alleges original jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332 and removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1441. Defendant alleges that Plaintiff and Defendant are citizens of different states, and the amount in controversy more likely than not exceeds $75,000.00. Defendant has met its burden of establishing diversity jurisdiction. The Court does not have discretion to remand a case over which the Court has subject matter jurisdiction. The fact there is no mention of Plaintiffs bankruptcy case does not divest the Court of jurisdiction. After consideration, the Court denies the Motion to Remand.

This case may be property of the estate. It is not clear to the Court whether the Trustee in Plaintiff's Chapter 13 case has made any determination as to the disposition of this case and whether the Trustee will be substituted for Plaintiff. The Court directs the Trustee to file a response to this Order within fourteen days advising the Court of the Trustee's position. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Motion to Remand (Dkt. 16) is denied. It is further

ORDERED that the Chapter 13 Trustee, Jon M. Waage, shall notify the Court as to the status of this case in relation to Plaintiffs Chapter 13 case. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to the following:

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer