Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PANAYOTOV v. ARONSON, 2:14-cv-750-FtM-38DNF. (2015)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20150210794 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Motion to Cancel the Hearing Scheduled for March 3, 2015 ( Doc. #44 ) filed on February 6, 2015. Plaintiff Samouil Bogomilov Panayotov, pro se, initiated this action by filing a complaint and motion for preliminary injunction on December 30, 2014. ( Doc. #1; Doc. #2 ). Thereafter, the Court scheduled a hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction. (Doc. #5). Now, Panayotov requests canceling the heari
More

ORDER1

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Motion to Cancel the Hearing Scheduled for March 3, 2015 (Doc. #44) filed on February 6, 2015. Plaintiff Samouil Bogomilov Panayotov, pro se, initiated this action by filing a complaint and motion for preliminary injunction on December 30, 2014. (Doc. #1; Doc. #2). Thereafter, the Court scheduled a hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction. (Doc. #5). Now, Panayotov requests canceling the hearing due to new information that he received from the Florida Board of Bar Examiners. Due to the instant motion, it appears that the motion for preliminary injunction is now moot. Consequently, the Court will cancel the hearing and moot the pending motion for preliminary injunction.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Motion to Cancel the Hearing Scheduled for March 3, 2015 (Doc. #44) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to cancel the hearing accordingly. The motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. #2) is DENIED as moot.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer