SCOTT v. ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING LLC, 5:14-cv-505-Oc-22PRL. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150311a18
Visitors: 1
Filed: Mar. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER PHILIP R. LAMMENS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' stipulated motion for entry of a Confidentiality Order. (Doc. 21). The parties have submitted a copy of their proposed Confidentiality Order (Doc. 21-1) and the Court has reviewed it. The Court is unable to enter the Order as drafted because it improperly provides that the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the Order after the conclusion of the case. (Doc. 21-1 at 11). Accordingly, the parti
Summary: ORDER PHILIP R. LAMMENS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' stipulated motion for entry of a Confidentiality Order. (Doc. 21). The parties have submitted a copy of their proposed Confidentiality Order (Doc. 21-1) and the Court has reviewed it. The Court is unable to enter the Order as drafted because it improperly provides that the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the Order after the conclusion of the case. (Doc. 21-1 at 11). Accordingly, the partie..
More
ORDER
PHILIP R. LAMMENS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' stipulated motion for entry of a Confidentiality Order. (Doc. 21). The parties have submitted a copy of their proposed Confidentiality Order (Doc. 21-1) and the Court has reviewed it. The Court is unable to enter the Order as drafted because it improperly provides that the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the Order after the conclusion of the case. (Doc. 21-1 at ¶11). Accordingly, the parties' motion (Doc. 21) is DENIED without prejudice to renewal upon the submission of a revised Confidentiality Order that does not contain this inappropriate provision.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
