Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BELTZ v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:14-cv-720-FtM-38CM. (2015)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20150316b17 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on review of the docket. On March 13, 2015, the Court rescheduled the Preliminary Pretrial Conference (PPTC) to April 13, 2015, at 2 p.m. (Doc. #13). The Court reminds the Parties that, pursuant to Middle District of Florida Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(B) , they are required to meet and prepare a Case Management Report before the PPTC. The substantive requirements of the Case Management Report are set out in
More

ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on review of the docket. On March 13, 2015, the Court rescheduled the Preliminary Pretrial Conference (PPTC) to April 13, 2015, at 2 p.m. (Doc. #13). The Court reminds the Parties that, pursuant to Middle District of Florida Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(B), they are required to meet and prepare a Case Management Report before the PPTC. The substantive requirements of the Case Management Report are set out in Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(C).

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

The Parties must prepare and file a Case Management Report prior to the Preliminary Pretrial Conference scheduled for April 13, 2015, at 2 p.m.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer