BLISS v. ETM TAMIAMI, LLC, 2:14-cv-710-FtM-38DNF. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150326b68
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaim ( Doc. #14 ) filed on February 3, 2015. One month after filing the instant Motion, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint ( Doc. #25 ), rendering Defendants' Answer and Counterclaim ( Doc. #12 ) moot. As a result, Plaintiffs' Motion is now moot. However, if Defendants reassert their Counterclaim in their Answer to the Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs m
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaim ( Doc. #14 ) filed on February 3, 2015. One month after filing the instant Motion, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint ( Doc. #25 ), rendering Defendants' Answer and Counterclaim ( Doc. #12 ) moot. As a result, Plaintiffs' Motion is now moot. However, if Defendants reassert their Counterclaim in their Answer to the Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs ma..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaim (Doc. #14) filed on February 3, 2015. One month after filing the instant Motion, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. #25), rendering Defendants' Answer and Counterclaim (Doc. #12) moot. As a result, Plaintiffs' Motion is now moot. However, if Defendants reassert their Counterclaim in their Answer to the Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs may renew their Motion at that time.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaim (Doc. #14) is DENIED as moot.
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source: Leagle
