Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HINSON v. WYETH, 2:05-cv-144-FtM-38DNF. (2015)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20150330974 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . On March 11, 2015, the Court entered an Order (Doc. #82) administratively closing the case for a period of time to allow the parties to submit final documents. On March 26, 2015, the Parties filed their Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice (Doc. #83). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) , allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case without a court order. The Rule reads in pertinent part: Subject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and
More

ORDER1

On March 11, 2015, the Court entered an Order (Doc. #82) administratively closing the case for a period of time to allow the parties to submit final documents. On March 26, 2015, the Parties filed their Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice (Doc. #83). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case without a court order. The Rule reads in pertinent part:

Subject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) A notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) A stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A).

In this instance, the Plaintiff informs the Court that he voluntarily dismisses the Complaint with prejudice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED:

The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment, dismiss the case with prejudice, terminate all pending motions, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer