Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CHICO'S FAS, INC. v. CLAIR, 2:13-cv-792-FtM-38DNF. (2015)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20150511688 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 08, 2015
Latest Update: May 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Due to the Court's calendar, the Court sua sponte extends the deadlines and schedule in the Case Management and Scheduling Order as follows: Joint Final Pretrial Statement (Including a July 3, 2015 Single Set of Jointly Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form, Voir Dire Questions, Witnesses Lists, and Exhibit Lists on Approved Form. [a Word version must be emailed to the Chambers inbox at chambers_flmd_chappell@flmd.uscour
More

ORDER1

Due to the Court's calendar, the Court sua sponte extends the deadlines and schedule in the Case Management and Scheduling Order as follows:

Joint Final Pretrial Statement (Including a July 3, 2015 Single Set of Jointly Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form, Voir Dire Questions, Witnesses Lists, and Exhibit Lists on Approved Form. [a Word version must be emailed to the Chambers inbox at chambers_flmd_chappell@flmd.uscourts.go v, unless excused by the Court] All Other Motions Including Motions In July 3, 2015 Limine, Trial Briefs Final Pretrial Conference Date: July 29, 2015 Time: 9:30 AM Judge: The Hon. Sheri Polster Chappell Trial Term Beginning August 4, 2015 Estimated Length of Trial 5 days Jury/Non Jury Jury

The Clerk is directed to alter the docket accordingly.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer