Filed: Jun. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 53; Report), entered by the Honorable Monte C. Richardson, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 27, 2015. In the Report, Judge Richardson recommends that Petitioner Alex Lee Campbell's Motion to Vacate Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Dkt. No. 1) be denied. See Report at 43. On May 13, 2015, Petitioner filed objections to the Report. See Defendant Alex Lee Campbell's Obj
Summary: ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 53; Report), entered by the Honorable Monte C. Richardson, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 27, 2015. In the Report, Judge Richardson recommends that Petitioner Alex Lee Campbell's Motion to Vacate Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Dkt. No. 1) be denied. See Report at 43. On May 13, 2015, Petitioner filed objections to the Report. See Defendant Alex Lee Campbell's Obje..
More
ORDER
MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 53; Report), entered by the Honorable Monte C. Richardson, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 27, 2015. In the Report, Judge Richardson recommends that Petitioner Alex Lee Campbell's Motion to Vacate Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Dkt. No. 1) be denied. See Report at 43. On May 13, 2015, Petitioner filed objections to the Report. See Defendant Alex Lee Campbell's Objection to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Filed April 27, 2015 (Dkt. No. 56; Objections). Respondent filed a response to the Objections on May 29, 2015. See United States' Response to Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 57; Response). Thus, the matter is ripe for review.
The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at * 1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007).
Upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in Judge Richardson's Report, the Court will overrule the Objections, and accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge.1 Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1. Defendant Alex Lee Campbell's Objection to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Filed April 27, 2015 (Dkt. No. 56) is OVERRULED.
2. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 53) is ADOPTED.
3. Petitioner Alex Lee Campbell's Motion to Vacate Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED.
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED.
