Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WAMBOLT v. COASTLINE TREE SERVICE, INC., 2:15-cv-211-FtM-38DNF. (2015)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20150619c79 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice ( Doc. #16 ) filed on June 17, 2015. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case without a court order. Rule 41(a)(1)(A) reads, in pertinent part, [s]ubject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) A notice of dismis
More

ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. #16) filed on June 17, 2015. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case without a court order. Rule 41(a)(1)(A) reads, in pertinent part,

[s]ubject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) A notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) A stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A).

In this instance, the parties stipulate to a voluntary dismissal without prejudice with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. All parties have signed the notice.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Pursuant to Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. #16) and Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Complaint (Doc. #1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file, terminate any and all pending motions, and enter judgment accordingly.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer