U.S. v. FARLEY, 8:15-cr-133-T-26MAP. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150729b82
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. LAZZARA , District Judge . UPON DUE AND CAREFUL CONSIDERATION of the procedural posture of this case, including the Government's representation that it intends "to immediately seek a superseding indictment to clarify certain counts in the indictment[,]" it is the Court's view that it would be in the interest of judicial and client economy to deny all pending motions without prejudice to being renewed after the superseding indictment is returned, assuming the superseding i
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. LAZZARA , District Judge . UPON DUE AND CAREFUL CONSIDERATION of the procedural posture of this case, including the Government's representation that it intends "to immediately seek a superseding indictment to clarify certain counts in the indictment[,]" it is the Court's view that it would be in the interest of judicial and client economy to deny all pending motions without prejudice to being renewed after the superseding indictment is returned, assuming the superseding in..
More
ORDER
RICHARD A. LAZZARA, District Judge.
UPON DUE AND CAREFUL CONSIDERATION of the procedural posture of this case, including the Government's representation that it intends "to immediately seek a superseding indictment to clarify certain counts in the indictment[,]" it is the Court's view that it would be in the interest of judicial and client economy to deny all pending motions without prejudice to being renewed after the superseding indictment is returned, assuming the superseding indictment does not cure the substantive deficiencies the Defendants claim exist in the current indictment. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Baltusis' Motion to Dismiss Count Six (Dkt. 37), Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss the Indictment (Dkt. 38), and Defendant Philip J. Farley, III's Motion for a Bill of Particulars (Dkt. 39) are denied without prejudice. The Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Joint Reply Briefs (Dkt. 47) is denied as moot. The Government shall seek a superseding indictment prior to the status conference currently scheduled for Thursday, September 10, 2015. At that conference, the Court will reschedule the deadline for the filing of motions.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
