MAGRO v. PETERSENDEAN ROOFING AND SOLAR SYSTEMS, INC., 6:15-cv-1093-Orl-31TBS. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150819832
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER GREGORY A. PRESNELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or Stay the Case and Compel Arbitration ("Motion") (Doc. 7) filed on July 31, 2015. This Court's Local Rule 3.01(b) gave the Plaintiff fourteen days after service of the Motion to respond in opposition. Eighteen days have elapsed since the Motion was filed and the Plaintiff has failed to respond, it will therefore be considered unopposed. In consideration o
Summary: ORDER GREGORY A. PRESNELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or Stay the Case and Compel Arbitration ("Motion") (Doc. 7) filed on July 31, 2015. This Court's Local Rule 3.01(b) gave the Plaintiff fourteen days after service of the Motion to respond in opposition. Eighteen days have elapsed since the Motion was filed and the Plaintiff has failed to respond, it will therefore be considered unopposed. In consideration of..
More
ORDER
GREGORY A. PRESNELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or Stay the Case and Compel Arbitration ("Motion") (Doc. 7) filed on July 31, 2015. This Court's Local Rule 3.01(b) gave the Plaintiff fourteen days after service of the Motion to respond in opposition. Eighteen days have elapsed since the Motion was filed and the Plaintiff has failed to respond, it will therefore be considered unopposed.
In consideration of the foregoing and it appearing that the Motion is meritorious, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. 7) is GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
