WALENDY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 6:14-cv-926-Orl-41GJK. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150909a53
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) filed on June 16, 2014, seeking judicial review under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying Plaintiff's application for Supplemental Social Security Income benefits. United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) on August 14, 2015, recommending that the Com
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) filed on June 16, 2014, seeking judicial review under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying Plaintiff's application for Supplemental Social Security Income benefits. United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) on August 14, 2015, recommending that the Comm..
More
ORDER
CARLOS E. MENDOZA, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) filed on June 16, 2014, seeking judicial review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying Plaintiff's application for Supplemental Social Security Income benefits. United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) on August 14, 2015, recommending that the Commissioner's final decision be reversed and that this case be remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
After an independent de novo review of the record and noting that no objections were timely filed, this Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.
Therefore, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. The Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation and this Order.
3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
