SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline (Dkt. 91), Defendants Lanier, McGuckin, Wright, and Lake's Response (Dkt. 93), and Defendant Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC's Response (Dkt. 95). The Court, having reviewed the motion, responses, and being otherwise advised, concludes that the motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
This is Plaintiffs' second motion to extend the discovery deadline. On August 11, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiffs' motion for extension of time to complete discovery (Dkt. 86), and extended the discovery deadline to October 2, 2015 (Dkt. 87). Plaintiffs' instant motion requests a 30-day extension of the discovery deadline to conduct depositions of Defendant Jamie Wright; Deputy Manny Martinez; Officer Thomas Abbott; Securitas, a private security firm; and Tom Meyers, Vice President of Mining for Mosaic. Defendants oppose Plaintiffs' motion to extend discovery as to four of the five requested depositions.
The Court has determined that Plaintiffs' motion to extend the discovery deadline should be granted for the limited purpose of conducting the deposition of Defendant Jamie Wright. With regard to Plaintiffs' request to conduct the depositions of Martinez, Abbott, Securitas, and Meyers, Plaintiffs have failed to show good cause to extend discovery for this purpose. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Sosa v. Airprint Sys., Inc., 133 F.3d 1417, 1418 (11th Cir.1998) (finding that the good cause standard precludes modification of a scheduling order unless the schedule cannot be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension).
Accordingly, it is