DYCK-O'NEAL, INC. v. ENGLAND, 2:15-cv-27-FtM-38MRM. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20151113816
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Brandt England's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #44) filed on November 9, 2015. The Court denies without prejudice Defendant's motion because it does not comply with the Court's procedure on a motion for summary judgment. Each motion for summary judgment must include a specifically captioned section titled, "Statement of Material Facts," that lists each material fact alleged not to be disp
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Brandt England's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #44) filed on November 9, 2015. The Court denies without prejudice Defendant's motion because it does not comply with the Court's procedure on a motion for summary judgment. Each motion for summary judgment must include a specifically captioned section titled, "Statement of Material Facts," that lists each material fact alleged not to be dispu..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Brandt England's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #44) filed on November 9, 2015. The Court denies without prejudice Defendant's motion because it does not comply with the Court's procedure on a motion for summary judgment. Each motion for summary judgment must include a specifically captioned section titled, "Statement of Material Facts," that lists each material fact alleged not to be disputed in separate, numbered paragraphs. See Letter to Counsel Regarding Updates to Policies and Procedures (Oct. 14, 2015) (emphasis added).2 In addition, each fact must be supported by a pinpoint citation to the specific part of the record relied upon to support that fact. Id. Because Defendant's motion does not list each fact alleged to be disputed in separate, numbered paragraphs, the Court denies his motion without prejudice.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
Defendant Brandt England's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #44) is DENIED without prejudice. Defendant may file an amended motion for summary judgment that complies with the Court's procedures on or before November 24, 2015. Plaintiff Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. may file a response thereto within fourteen (14) days of service of Defendant's amended motion for summary judgment.
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
2. See also the undersigned's website at http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/judicialinfo/ftmyers/JgChappell.htm.
Source: Leagle
