Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GARDNER v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 6:14-cv-508-Orl-18DAB. (2016)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20160127a92 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2016
Summary: ORDER G. KENDALL SHARP , District Judge . THIS CAUSE comes for consideration on Defendant Ford Motor Company's ("Ford") Proposed Bill of Costs (Doc. 130) and Plaintiffs Harry and Meredith Gardner's ("the Gardners") Response and Objections to Defendant Ford Motor Company's Bill of Costs Against Plaintiffs (the "Motion") (Doc. 132), which the Court referred to United States Magistrate Judge David A. Baker for a report and recommendation. On December 10, 2015, Judge Baker issued his Report and
More

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration on Defendant Ford Motor Company's ("Ford") Proposed Bill of Costs (Doc. 130) and Plaintiffs Harry and Meredith Gardner's ("the Gardners") Response and Objections to Defendant Ford Motor Company's Bill of Costs Against Plaintiffs (the "Motion") (Doc. 132), which the Court referred to United States Magistrate Judge David A. Baker for a report and recommendation. On December 10, 2015, Judge Baker issued his Report and Recommendation (Doc. 136), recommending that the Motion be granted in part and denied in part. No objections were filed. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. United States Magistrate Judge David A. Baker's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 136) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiffs Harry and Meredith Gardner's ("the Gardners") Response and Objections to Defendant Ford Motor Company's Bill of Costs Against Plaintiffs is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Ford is TAXED COSTS in the total amount of $12,123.72

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer