Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:15-cv-359-FtM-CM. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20160427c18
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER CAROL MIRANDO , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 25), filed on April 25, 2016. Defendant requests that the Court remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. Pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 405(g), the Court may reverse the decision of the Commissioner with or without remanding the case for a rehearing. Upon due consideratio
Summary: ORDER CAROL MIRANDO , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 25), filed on April 25, 2016. Defendant requests that the Court remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. Pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 405(g), the Court may reverse the decision of the Commissioner with or without remanding the case for a rehearing. Upon due consideration..
More
ORDER
CAROL MIRANDO, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 25), filed on April 25, 2016. Defendant requests that the Court remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. Pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 405(g), the Court may reverse the decision of the Commissioner with or without remanding the case for a rehearing. Upon due consideration, Defendant's motion will be granted.
ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1. Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 25) is GRANTED. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this action is REMANDED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner for the Administrative Law Judge to:
a. Evaluate the evidentiary record;
b. Further evaluate Plaintiff's mental impairments in accordance with the special technique described in 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520a, 416.920a;
c. Reassess Plaintiff's residual functional capacity and provide appropriate rationale with specific references to evidence of record in support of the assessed limitations in accordance with 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1545, 416.945 and SSR 96-8p;
d. If warranted, obtain evidence from a vocational expert in accordance with the applicable regulations; and
e. Take any further action necessary.
2. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
