KROPILAK v. 21st CENTURY SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, 8:12-CIV-1816-T-EAK-TGW. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20160523831
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 20, 2016
Latest Update: May 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER FOR ENTRY OF BILL OF COSTS ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on a pending proposed bill of costs (Doc. 164) which was filed by the Defendant after trial of this case. The Plaintiff, Nicole L. Collins, filed a response to the motion (Doc. 167) asking the Court to refuse to tax costs due to her being "financially incapable of satisfying such and award." The Defendant filed a response to request the Court to direct entry of the bill of costs (Doc
Summary: ORDER FOR ENTRY OF BILL OF COSTS ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on a pending proposed bill of costs (Doc. 164) which was filed by the Defendant after trial of this case. The Plaintiff, Nicole L. Collins, filed a response to the motion (Doc. 167) asking the Court to refuse to tax costs due to her being "financially incapable of satisfying such and award." The Defendant filed a response to request the Court to direct entry of the bill of costs (Doc...
More
ORDER FOR ENTRY OF BILL OF COSTS
ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on a pending proposed bill of costs (Doc. 164) which was filed by the Defendant after trial of this case. The Plaintiff, Nicole L. Collins, filed a response to the motion (Doc. 167) asking the Court to refuse to tax costs due to her being "financially incapable of satisfying such and award." The Defendant filed a response to request the Court to direct entry of the bill of costs (Doc. 169).
In support of the objection to awarding costs, Ms. Collins filed her affidavit wherein she states she is financially unable to pay the costs, making bare allegations unsupported by any evidence. The Court finds the Defendant's response well-taken. There is no documentation to support these bare allegations Rivera v. City of Chicago, 469 F.3d 631 (7th Cir 2006). Having reviewed the objections and the response thereto, the Court finds that the objections are not persuasive. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the objections to the proposed bill of costs are overruled and the Clerk of Court is directed to enter the bill of costs found at document 164.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
