U.S. v. Lopez-Valencia, 8:12-cr-506-T-33MAP. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20160601949
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 31, 2016
Latest Update: May 31, 2016
Summary: Order Regarding Prison-Term Reduction Under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) Based on USSG Amend. 782 VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court sua sponte in an effort to provide clarity in the record. On May 26, 2016, the United States Probation Office filed an Amendment 782 Memorandum indicating that the Defendant is ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) based on USSG Amend. 782, a retroactive guideline amendment, see U
Summary: Order Regarding Prison-Term Reduction Under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) Based on USSG Amend. 782 VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court sua sponte in an effort to provide clarity in the record. On May 26, 2016, the United States Probation Office filed an Amendment 782 Memorandum indicating that the Defendant is ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) based on USSG Amend. 782, a retroactive guideline amendment, see US..
More
Order Regarding Prison-Term Reduction Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Based on USSG Amend. 782
VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court sua sponte in an effort to provide clarity in the record. On May 26, 2016, the United States Probation Office filed an Amendment 782 Memorandum indicating that the Defendant is ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on USSG Amend. 782, a retroactive guideline amendment, see USSG § 1B1.10(d) (2014). (Doc. # 93). Specifically, the Amendment 782 Memorandum indicates the Defendant is not eligible because the Defendant was sentenced at the statutory minimum mandatory. (Id.). Therefore, the Court does not grant a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 782. If circumstances warrant, the Court may revisit the matter.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
