Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kennedy v. Khulna Inc., 2:16-cv-192-FtM-38CM. (2016)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20160627611 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER CAROL MIRANDO , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon review of Plaintiff Patricia Kennedy's Motion to Compel Defendant to Participate in the Case Management Conference, Motion for Leave to Hold Case Management Conference via Telephone, and Motion for Extension of Time to File the Case Management Report (Doc. 33) filed on June 22, 2016. Plaintiff filed her complaint on March 14, 2016. Doc. 1. As of June 14, 2016, the record reflected that only two Defendants wer
More

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court upon review of Plaintiff Patricia Kennedy's Motion to Compel Defendant to Participate in the Case Management Conference, Motion for Leave to Hold Case Management Conference via Telephone, and Motion for Extension of Time to File the Case Management Report (Doc. 33) filed on June 22, 2016.

Plaintiff filed her complaint on March 14, 2016. Doc. 1. As of June 14, 2016, the record reflected that only two Defendants were served, one of whom was dismissed. See Docs. 24, 25. As such, on June 14, 2016, the Court entered an Order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, on or before June 24, 2016, why the remaining Defendants have not been served and why a Case Management Report has not been filed. Doc. 26. On June 20, 2016, Plaintiff filed five Returns of Service that were executed between March 31, 2016 and May 17, 2016; however, neither of these Defendants have filed an answer or otherwise defended against this action and the time to do so has expired. See Docs. 28-32. Defendants' failure to respond to the Complaint, however, has not prompted Plaintiff to move for clerk's default under Middle District of Florida Local Rule 1.07. Plaintiff thus has evidenced a lack of interest in prosecuting this case. See M.D. Fla. R. 3.10(a).

In response to the Court's previous Order to show cause, Plaintiff filed the instant motion requesting an order compelling the only Defendant that has appeared in the action to participate in the case management conference and prepare a Case Management Report. Pursuant to the Related Case Order and Track Two Notice "[a]ll parties must comply with the requirements set in Local Rule 3.05 for Track Two cases." Doc. 10 at 2. Moreover, "counsel and any unrepresented party shall meet within THIRTY (30) DAYS after service of the complaint upon any defendant, or the first appearance of any defendant, to prepare a Case Management Report." Id. While there already is an Order in place requiring compliance by all parties with the local rules, the Court finds good cause to grant an extension of time up to and including July 8, 2016 so that Plaintiff and all parties who have been served may confer to prepare an agreed upon Case Management Report and file same with the Court. The parties may confer telephonically.

ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff, Patricia Kennedy's, Motion to Compel Defendant to Participate in the Case Management Conference, Motion for Leave to Hold Case Management Conference via Telephone, and Motion for Extension of Time to File the Case Management Report (Doc. 33) is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, on or before June 30, 2016, why she has failed to move for clerk's default against Defendants that have been served but failed to respond or otherwise defend against this action. Failure to comply with this directive will result in the Court recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, notwithstanding the relief provided in this Order.

3. Plaintiff shall furnish a copy of this Order on all parties served.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer