Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HUNT v. CUCKLER, 2:16-cv-408-FtM-38MRM. (2016)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20160729951 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Joint Stipulation Agreeing to Remand (Doc. #26) filed on July 26, 2016. Plaintiff initiated this suit against Defendants in the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida on April 8, 2016. (Doc. #2). Defendants thereafter removed the case to this Court. (Doc. #1). Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand (Doc. #8), to which Defendants responded (Doc. #13).
More

ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Joint Stipulation Agreeing to Remand (Doc. #26) filed on July 26, 2016. Plaintiff initiated this suit against Defendants in the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida on April 8, 2016. (Doc. #2). Defendants thereafter removed the case to this Court. (Doc. #1). Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand (Doc. #8), to which Defendants responded (Doc. #13). The parties now stipulate to remanding the above-captioned case to the state court.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) The parties' Joint Stipulation Agreeing to Remand (Doc. #26) is GRANTED. (2) This case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida. (3) The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida. (4) The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate pending motions and close the case.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer