GOERS v. L.A. ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., 2:15-cv-00412-FTM-99CM. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20170127n88
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2017
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on sua sponte review of the docket. Plaintiffs filed their Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims without Prejudice (Doc. #73) on September 13, 2016. They then filed a Notice of Withdrawal of their Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims (Doc. #78) on September 30, 2016. "A plaintiff wishing to eliminate particular claims or issues from the action should amend the complaint under Rule 15(a) rather than dismiss
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on sua sponte review of the docket. Plaintiffs filed their Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims without Prejudice (Doc. #73) on September 13, 2016. They then filed a Notice of Withdrawal of their Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims (Doc. #78) on September 30, 2016. "A plaintiff wishing to eliminate particular claims or issues from the action should amend the complaint under Rule 15(a) rather than dismiss u..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on sua sponte review of the docket. Plaintiffs filed their Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims without Prejudice (Doc. #73) on September 13, 2016. They then filed a Notice of Withdrawal of their Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims (Doc. #78) on September 30, 2016.
"A plaintiff wishing to eliminate particular claims or issues from the action should amend the complaint under Rule 15(a) rather than dismiss under Rule 41(a)." Binns v. Caesars Entm't Corp., No. 2:14-CV-506-FTM-38, 2014 WL 5378227, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 21, 2014) (quoting Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 1092, 1106 (11th Cir. 2004)). Because Plaintiffs cannot remove a single count from their Complaint without following the proper procedure, their Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #73) must be denied.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims without Prejudice (Doc. #73) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source: Leagle
