Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. SIRKIN, 8:16-cr-353-T-30JSS. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20170717773 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 14, 2017
Summary: FORFEITURE MONEY JUDGMENT JAMES S. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The United States moves (Doc. 307) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 982(a)(7) and Rule 32.2(b)(2), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, for a forfeiture money judgment in the amount of $608,854.00 against the defendant, representing the amount of proceeds he obtained as a result of the conspiracy to commit health care fraud as charged in Count One of the Indictment. Being fully advised of the relevant facts, the Court finds that as a
More

FORFEITURE MONEY JUDGMENT

The United States moves (Doc. 307) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(7) and Rule 32.2(b)(2), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, for a forfeiture money judgment in the amount of $608,854.00 against the defendant, representing the amount of proceeds he obtained as a result of the conspiracy to commit health care fraud as charged in Count One of the Indictment.

Being fully advised of the relevant facts, the Court finds that as a result of the conspiracy to commit health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, as charged in Count One of the Indictment, defendant Bradley Sirkin obtained proceeds in the amount of $608,854.00.

The Court further finds that under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as incorporated by 18 U.S.C. § 982(b)(1), the United States is entitled to forfeit any property belonging to the defendant as a substitute asset to satisfy his money judgment.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 307) of the United States is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(7) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(2), defendant Bradley Sirkin is liable, to the United States of America for a forfeiture money judgment in the amount of $608,854.00, representing the amount of proceeds he obtained as a result of the conspiracy to commit health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, as charged in Count One of the Indictment, for which he was convicted.

The Court retains jurisdiction to effect the forfeiture and disposition of any substitute assets the government is entitled to seek, under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as incorporated by 18 U.S.C. § 982(b)(1), to satisfy the defendant's money judgment.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer