Filed: Jul. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2017
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #46), filed June 29, 2017, recommending that the Application for Clerk's Default Against Van Emmerik Custom Homes, Inc. be granted, and the Clerk be directed to enter a default. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations,
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #46), filed June 29, 2017, recommending that the Application for Clerk's Default Against Van Emmerik Custom Homes, Inc. be granted, and the Clerk be directed to enter a default. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN E. STEELE, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #46), filed June 29, 2017, recommending that the Application for Clerk's Default Against Van Emmerik Custom Homes, Inc. be granted, and the Clerk be directed to enter a default. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F.Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).
The recommendation comes after two Orders were issued cautioning defendant of the potential consequence if no appearance by counsel was entered within the time provided. Defendant Van Emmerik Custom Homes, Inc. failed to retain counsel, or to respond to either Order. After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #46) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein.
2. Plaintiff's Application for Clerk's Default Against Van Emmerik Custom Homes, Inc. (Doc. #45) is GRANTED.
3. The Clerk shall enter a default against defendant Van Emmerik Custom Homes, Inc. for failure to retain counsel and comply with the Court's Orders.
4. Plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the entry of the default.
DONE and ORDERED.
