Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF UNDERWOOD, 2:16-cv-417-FtM-38CM. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20171010b70 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER 1 IN ADMIRALTY SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner's Response in Opposition to Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) filed on September 25, 2017. Because Petitioner failed to follow the Court's procedures, the Response shall be stricken. Each response in opposition to a motion for summary judgment must include a section titled "Response to Statement of Material Facts" that "mirror[s] the statement of materi
More

ORDER1

IN ADMIRALTY

This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner's Response in Opposition to Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) filed on September 25, 2017. Because Petitioner failed to follow the Court's procedures, the Response shall be stricken. Each response in opposition to a motion for summary judgment must include a section titled "Response to Statement of Material Facts" that "mirror[s] the statement of material facts [found in the motion for summary judgment] by admitting and/or denying each of the moving party's assertions in matching numbered paragraphs." See Court Procedures.2 Petitioner's Response does not follow this directive.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Petitioner's Response in Opposition to Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) is stricken from the record. Petitioner may file an amended response in opposition that complies with the Court's procedures on or before October 19, 2017.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
2. The Court's procedures can be found on its website. See http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/judicialinfo/ftmyers/JgChappell.htm
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer