Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HISCOX DEDICATED CORPORATE MEMBER LTD. v. DAMASCUS TRADING COMPANY, LLC, 2:17-cv-146-FtM-99CM. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20171010b75 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on review of the parties' Joint Status Report (Doc. 22) filed on October 5, 2017. The parties inform the Court that the appraisal process remains ongoing and request that the Court continue the stay of this matter for another 150 days to allow sufficient time for the appraisal to conclude. Because the parties are in agreement regarding the appraisal, the Court will continue the stay for this time period b
More

ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on review of the parties' Joint Status Report (Doc. 22) filed on October 5, 2017. The parties inform the Court that the appraisal process remains ongoing and request that the Court continue the stay of this matter for another 150 days to allow sufficient time for the appraisal to conclude. Because the parties are in agreement regarding the appraisal, the Court will continue the stay for this time period but will not be inclined to extend it any further.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

This matter is stayed until March 5, 2018, or such time as the parties inform the Court that the stay is due to be lifted or the matter otherwise dismissed.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer