Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pozo v. Direct Heating & Cooling, Inc., 2:17-cv-170-FtM-99MRM. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20171026c84 Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2017
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on review of United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23), recommending that the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. 22) be denied without prejudice because the settlement agreements contain waiver and general release language. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. A district judge "may ac
More

OPINION AND ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on review of United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23), recommending that the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. 22) be denied without prejudice because the settlement agreements contain waiver and general release language. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." Id. And "[t]he judge may also receive further evidenced or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." Id.

This is the second time that the parties' Settlement Agreements and General Releases were not recommended for approval based on the presence of a waiver and general release without evidence of any additional consideration. See Docs. 20, 21. Once again, after conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation and denies the request for settlement approval without prejudice. Failure to file settlement agreements that comport with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation could result in the Court finding that a settlement has not been reached and the case will proceed through normal litigation.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23) is accepted and adopted and its findings incorporated herein.

(2) The parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. 22) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the parties exercising one of the two options provided in the Report and Recommendation, on or before November 17, 2017.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer