SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on review of United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23), recommending that the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. 22) be denied without prejudice because the settlement agreements contain waiver and general release language. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.
A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." Id. And "[t]he judge may also receive further evidenced or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." Id.
This is the second time that the parties' Settlement Agreements and General Releases were not recommended for approval based on the presence of a waiver and general release without evidence of any additional consideration. See Docs. 20, 21. Once again, after conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation and denies the request for settlement approval without prejudice. Failure to file settlement agreements that comport with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation could result in the Court finding that a settlement has not been reached and the case will proceed through normal litigation.
Accordingly, it is now
(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23) is
(2) The parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. 22) is