Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Edwards v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., 8:16-cv-334-T-35AAS. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20171129a08 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2017
Summary: ORDER AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE , Magistrate Judge . This cause is before the Court sua sponte. On June 22, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Equitable Distribution of a Personal Injury Settlement ("Motion"). (Doc. 38). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Motion was referred to the undersigned to enter an order or submit a report and recommendation. (Doc. 39). The undersigned held a telephonic hearing to address the status of the unresolved balances with the remaining lienholders. ( See Doc. 49
More

ORDER

This cause is before the Court sua sponte. On June 22, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Equitable Distribution of a Personal Injury Settlement ("Motion"). (Doc. 38). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Motion was referred to the undersigned to enter an order or submit a report and recommendation. (Doc. 39). The undersigned held a telephonic hearing to address the status of the unresolved balances with the remaining lienholders. (See Doc. 49). At the telephonic hearing, counsel for Plaintiff advised the undersigned that the liens of Cora Rehab, Next Image Medical a/k/a Palm Harbor MRI, Northwood Anesthesia, and Trinity Urgent Care a/k/a Suncoast Urgent Care could not be settled until Sedgwick Claims Management's ("Sedgwick") lien was settled.

Plaintiff has since settled the dispute with Sedgwick regarding the amount of Sedgwick's lien. (See Doc. 52). Accordingly, the undersigned ordered Plaintiff to provide an update by November 13, 2017, as to what, if anything, remains for the Court to adjudicate in Plaintiff's Motion. (Id.). The Court then ordered Plaintiff to provide an update as to his Motion by November 22, 2017. (Doc. 54). The Court also advised Plaintiff that his failure to update the Court would result in his Motion being denied as moot. Plaintiff's November 22nd deadline has passed, and he failed to advise the Court as to what, if anything, is left for the Court to determine.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Equitable Distribution of a Personal Injury Settlement is DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer