Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Menard v. Commissioner of Social Security, 8:16-cv-2260-T-AAS. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20171204986 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2017
Summary: ORDER AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE , Magistrate Judge . This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Consent Petition for Attorney Fees. (Doc. 27). Plaintiff asserts that the Commissioner does not oppose the requested relief. ( Id. at 3). Plaintiff seeks attorney's fees in the amount of $6,913.37 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412. Plaintiff asks for $770.72 in fees for work performed on the case in 2016, calculated at a rate of $192.68 per hour for 4 hou
More

ORDER

This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Consent Petition for Attorney Fees. (Doc. 27). Plaintiff asserts that the Commissioner does not oppose the requested relief. (Id. at 3).

Plaintiff seeks attorney's fees in the amount of $6,913.37 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Plaintiff asks for $770.72 in fees for work performed on the case in 2016, calculated at a rate of $192.68 per hour for 4 hours, and $6,142.65 in fees for work performed on the case in 2017, calculated at a rate of $195.26 per hour for 31 hours.2

The Court entered an order reversing and remanding the case under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 25). The Clerk entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff the next day. (Doc. 26). As the prevailing party, Plaintiff now requests an award of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(1) & (d)(1)(A). As judgment for Plaintiff was entered on September 14, 2017, and Plaintiff filed her Petition for Attorney's Fees on November 29, 2017, the Court has jurisdiction to award the requested fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B).3

After issuance of an order awarding EAJA fees, however, the United States Department of the Treasury will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If Plaintiff has no discernable federal debt, the government will accept Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel. (Doc. 27-1, pp. 2-3).

For the reasons set out in Plaintiff's motion, therefore, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Consent Petition for Attorney Fees (Doc. 27) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff is awarded $6,913.37 in attorney's fees pursuant to the EAJA.

DONE AND ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Between the filing of this suit and the entry of this Order, Nancy A. Berryhill replaced Carolyn W. Colvin as acting Commissioner. As such, Ms. Berryhill is "automatically substituted as a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).
2. The undersigned finds the hourly rates requested reasonable in light of Consumer Price Index Inflation Calculator. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A) ("[A]ttorney fees shall not be awarded in excess of $125 per hour unless the court determines that an increase in the cost of living . . . justifies a higher fee.").
3. The sixty-day appeal period expired on November 14, 2017, at which point the Court's judgment became final. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(b). Therefore, Plaintiff's deadline for filing a petition for EAJA fees is December 15, 2017. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer